Skip to content 
On 12 June 2024 our client, Jarryd Hayne, was released from custody after having his sexual assault convictions quashed on appeal.
The NSW Court of Criminal Appeal decision can be read here: https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/1900629ad55eb1f44122c82c
Jarryd Hayne’s successful appeal drew wide public attention across NSW and Australia. The decision was significant, not just because of Hayne’s public profile, but because it showed how appeal courts examine trial process, jury directions, evidence issues and fairness after a conviction.
On 12 June 2024, the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal granted Hayne leave to appeal, upheld two appeal grounds, quashed his two convictions and ordered a new trial. The court dismissed the ground that argued the verdicts were unreasonable or unsupported by the evidence. The successful grounds concerned trial fairness, including the refusal to recall the complainant for further evidence and the trial judge’s direction about alleged lies.
For people searching for a criminal appeal lawyer in NSW, this case is a clear reminder that an appeal is not simply a second attempt at the same trial. Appeals focus on whether a legal error, miscarriage of justice or other appealable issue affected the outcome.
MacDougall & Hydes Lawyers acted for Hayne in the appeal, as recorded in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal judgment. The firm’s brand guidance emphasises discreet, expert criminal defence, clear advice and strategic representation in high-stakes matters, which aligns with the type of serious appeal work this case involved.
Key Takeaways
- Jarryd Hayne’s convictions were quashed after the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal found errors linked to the fairness of the trial process.
- The appeal did not succeed on every ground. The court rejected the argument that the jury’s guilty verdicts were unreasonable.
- A criminal appeal is technical. It usually turns on legal error, trial fairness, jury directions, evidence rulings or miscarriage of justice.
- High-profile cases need careful handling. Legal strategy, privacy and public attention can all affect how a matter is managed.
- Early legal advice matters. A person considering an appeal should act quickly, as strict time limits can apply.
What Happened in the Jarryd Hayne Appeal?
Hayne had been convicted in the NSW District Court in April 2023 of two counts of sexual intercourse without consent. The alleged conduct related to events in September 2018. He was sentenced in May 2023 to imprisonment for 4 years and 9 months, with a non-parole period of 3 years.
Hayne appealed to the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal on three main grounds:
| Appeal Ground | What It Concerned | Outcome |
| Ground 1 | Whether the jury’s guilty verdicts were unreasonable or unsupported by the evidence | Dismissed |
| Ground 2 | Whether the trial judge erred by refusing to allow the complainant to give further evidence about interactions with others | Upheld |
| Ground 3 | Whether a miscarriage of justice occurred because of the trial judge’s direction about alleged lies | Upheld |
The result was that the court quashed both convictions and ordered a new trial. Later reporting stated that the NSW Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions decided not to proceed with a fourth trial.
This outcome does not mean every person convicted of a crime will have an appeal available. It means the appeal court found particular legal errors that were serious enough to affect the safety or fairness of the convictions.
Why This Case Matters in Criminal Justice NSW
High-profile appeals can shape public discussion about criminal justice in NSW, but they should be read with care. Media coverage often focuses on the result. The court focuses on the law.
In Hayne’s case, the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal did not decide the matter by public opinion. It reviewed the trial record, the grounds of appeal and the legal issues raised. This is important for anyone trying to understand what a criminal appeal can and cannot do.
An appeal court may consider whether:
- the trial judge made an error of law
- the jury received an incorrect or unfair direction
- evidence was wrongly admitted or excluded
- the accused was denied a fair chance to test evidence
- the verdict was unreasonable or could not be supported by the evidence
- a miscarriage of justice occurred
The Hayne decision is a strong example of how appeal courts examine the process that led to a conviction. The court’s role is not to run the trial again from the beginning. Its role is to test whether the conviction should stand under the law.
What Does “Convictions Quashed” Mean?
When convictions are quashed, they are set aside. The legal effect is that the convictions no longer stand.
That does not always mean the accused is finally cleared of the charges. In many cases, the appeal court may order a new trial. After that, prosecutors decide whether they will proceed.
In Hayne’s case, the appeal court ordered a new trial. The later decision about whether to run another trial sat with the prosecution. Public reporting later confirmed the ODPP would not proceed with a fourth trial.
For someone facing a criminal appeal, this distinction matters. A successful appeal may lead to:
- an acquittal
- a new trial
- a changed sentence
- a different order from the appeal court
The result depends on the type of appeal, the error found and the legal remedy available.
Why Legal Errors Can Change the Outcome of a Criminal Case
Criminal trials must follow strict rules. These rules protect both sides. They help make sure the jury hears evidence fairly, receives proper legal directions and understands how to apply the law.
In serious matters, even one direction from a judge can become a major appeal issue. A jury may need guidance on how to treat evidence, how to assess reliability, what must be proved by the prosecution and what cannot be used as reasoning against an accused person.
This is why criminal appeal work requires detailed review. Lawyers often examine:
- the indictment and charges
- transcripts from the trial
- written rulings made during the trial
- jury directions
- evidentiary decisions
- appealable errors under NSW law
- possible miscarriage of justice
MacDougall & Hydes’ ideal client profile identifies serious indictable matters, sexual offences, white-collar matters and high-profile public figure cases as priority areas where people often need urgent, strategic and discreet legal advice.
Criminal Appeals Are Time-Sensitive
Appeals need urgent attention. A person should get legal advice as soon as possible after conviction or sentence.
In NSW, appeal rights and time limits can be strict. The correct pathway may depend on whether the matter was heard in the Local Court, District Court or Supreme Court. It may also depend on whether the appeal relates to conviction, sentence or both.
Common warning signs that you need urgent appeal advice include:
- you believe the judge made an error
- key evidence was excluded or wrongly admitted
- the jury may have received the wrong legal direction
- the verdict appears inconsistent with the evidence
- fresh evidence has become available
- the sentence appears excessive
- there were serious issues with how the trial was conducted
For serious charges, delay can place pressure on appeal preparation. It may affect the ability to obtain transcripts, review evidence and prepare grounds.
What This Means for Sexual Offence Defence Sydney Matters
Sexual offence cases can be complex, sensitive and highly stressful. They often involve detailed evidence, consent issues, witness accounts, digital communications and strict rules about what can be published.
The Hayne judgment noted that publication restrictions applied, including a prohibition on publishing any matter likely to identify the complainant. This is a reminder that sexual offence proceedings require careful handling, both in court and in public communication.
For people searching for sexual offence defence Sydney, the lesson is not that every conviction can be overturned. The lesson is that serious sexual offence matters need early, careful legal advice at every stage, from police contact through to trial and any appeal.
A defence lawyer may help by:
- explaining the charge and what must be proved
- advising before a police interview
- reviewing brief evidence
- preparing cross-examination strategy
- identifying evidence that may support the defence
- protecting the client’s legal rights
- managing court deadlines
- assessing appeal grounds after conviction
How a Criminal Appeal Lawyer Reviews a Case
A strong appeal starts with a careful review. The lawyer must identify whether there is a proper legal basis to appeal. Disagreement with the verdict is rarely enough on its own.
A criminal appeal lawyer NSW may review the matter in stages:
| Stage | What the Lawyer Reviews | Why It Matters |
| Trial record | Transcript, exhibits, rulings and jury directions | To identify possible legal error |
| Evidence issues | What evidence was admitted, excluded or limited | To see whether the trial was fair |
| Grounds of appeal | Legal arguments available under appeal law | To decide whether the appeal has merit |
| Remedy | New trial, acquittal, sentence change or other order | To understand possible outcomes |
| Timing | Appeal deadlines and filing requirements | To protect the client’s rights |
This process needs focus and experience. A poorly prepared appeal can miss the strongest point. A well-prepared appeal presents the issue clearly and supports it with law, evidence and the trial record.
What Statistics Show About Criminal Courts and Appeals
Criminal appeals are a small but serious part of the justice system. The Supreme Court of NSW’s 2024 provisional statistics reported 318 Court of Criminal Appeal filings in 2024, including 97 appeals against conviction. The same statistics reported that 322 Court of Criminal Appeal cases were finalised within 12 months in 2024, equal to 98% of relevant cases.
The Supreme Court of NSW 2024 Annual Review likewise stated that the Court of Criminal Appeal met or exceeded national timeliness benchmarks, with 98% of cases finalised within 12 months.
Across the broader criminal court system, the Australian Bureau of Statistics reported 521,632 defendants finalised in Australian Criminal Courts in 2024–25. It also reported that most court judgments resulted in a guilty outcome, and that traffic and vehicle offences accounted for 38% of defendants.
In NSW, BOCSAR’s criminal court statistics for July 2020 to June 2025 reported that the proportion of defendants with a proven outcome receiving a custodial penalty increased from 9.1% to 10.0%, with the number receiving custodial penalties rising from 11,157 to 13,035.
These figures show why appeal advice can be so important. A conviction or sentence can have serious effects on liberty, work, reputation and family life.
When to Contact a Criminal Appeal Lawyer
You should seek appeal advice quickly if you or someone close to you has been convicted or sentenced and there are concerns about what happened in court.
This is especially urgent if the case involves:
- a prison sentence
- sexual offence allegations
- serious indictable charges
- media attention
- professional or licensing consequences
- disputed evidence
- concerns about jury directions
- possible new evidence
- reputation risk
MacDougall & Hydes’ brand position centres on expert legal defence, discretion, personalised advice and responsive support in criminal and regulatory matters. These qualities are especially important in appeal matters, where careful preparation and clear communication can make a real difference.
Final Words
The Jarryd Hayne appeal is an important reminder that criminal convictions can be reviewed when there are proper legal grounds. It also shows that appeal courts look closely at trial fairness, evidence issues and jury directions.
A criminal appeal is not simple. It is a technical legal process that calls for experience, judgment and careful preparation. For anyone dealing with a conviction, sentence or serious charge, early advice can help clarify the next step.
If you are facing similar charges, contact the MacDougall & Hydes.